• The Jacobite Chronicles Series & The Jacobite Chronicles Stories
Julia-Brennan-600Julia-Brennan-600Julia-Brennan-600Julia-Brennan-600
  • Home
  • Julia Brannan Books
    • Audiobooks
  • Blogs
    • Historical Articles
    • Historical People Biographies
    • Historical Locations
    • Book News
  • About
    • Interviews with Julia Brannan
  • Reference Library
  • Contact
    • Join my Newsletter
✕
            No results See all results

            FREDERICK PRINCE OF WALES – FINAL YEARS

            • Home
            • Blogs
            • Historical People Biographies
            • FREDERICK PRINCE OF WALES – FINAL YEARS
            October 1, 2018
            Categories
            • Historical People Biographies
            Tags
            • 18th Century
            • British Monarchs
            • Georgians
            • hanoverians
            • Prince Frederick

             

            During the ’45 Prince Frederick took no active part in the military process, unlike his younger brother the Duke of Cumberland. He did directly ask for the command of the army heading to face Prince Charles Edward Stuart and was refused, understandably so, as he had never been allowed to see any military action and so was completely inexperienced. But he took it as a personal rebuff, and was deeply hurt. As a result he showed a lack of any interest in the rising, going to the theatre as usual, and engaging in a sugar-plum bombardment of a marzipan model of Carlisle Castle as a joke, at the same time as Cumberland was advancing on the real castle. Now it’s easy to see this as a reaction to rejection, but at the time some thought he might be a Jacobite sympathiser, even though it was a somewhat ridiculous idea. Had the Jacobites won, Frederick too would have lost his chance to one day be King of Great Britain.

             

            Prince Frederick as an adult

             

            After the ’45 he was very merciful to the prisoners, going to pay respects to Flora MacDonald, trying to intervene to save the life of Lord Cromarty and preventing the censure of Oxford University. Later he included known Jacobites in his entourage, and seems to have done his best to quell the wave of brutality and severity that followed the rising.

            Frederick had for some years attracted a political following of those who were unhappy with the king’s and current government’s policies, and in 1747 decided to set himself up in opposition at the general election. He provided funds to purchase seats and votes, and wrote up a manifesto, which was published under his name.

            This was a serious enough threat to the establishment that the Duke of Newcastle and his brother the Prime Minister were very alarmed, and asked the king to intervene. King George refused, not out of loyalty to his son, but because he had no liking for the Pelham family.

            In the end the prince’s opposition, though winning him about one hundred seats, was insufficient to have any power at all. But he continued to make his presence felt and remained involved in politics, and was taken seriously by the large number of courtiers who were aware of the age of King George and that Prince Frederick would one day, maybe soon, be the king.

             

            Frederick, Prince of Wales by Thomas Frye, mezzotint, published 1741

            For his part Frederick must have been aware that the king would far prefer the Duke of Cumberland to succeed him on his death than his eldest son, although in fairness to Cumberland, he never expressed the slightest inclination to usurp Frederick’s place as heir.

            Prince Frederick clearly thought he would probably be king before the next general election was held, and with King George again in Hanover in 1750, began to draw up plans for that eventuality, which would include dissolving parliament, holding another election, and making sure that none of his children could openly oppose him as he ascended the throne.

            However, none of these plans or those of his followers came to be, because, completely unexpectedly, on 20th March 1751 (31stNS) Prince Frederick died. The cause of his death has been disputed ever since. One story has it that he was hit in the chest with a cricket ball some years before, and that it was the resulting injury that eventually killed him. Another story says that got very wet and cold working in his garden, then went straight to attend a ceremony, wearing hot and heavy formal robes, and then once home, sat on a couch by an open window, and thus caught the chill which killed him.

            Prince Frederick, 1740-50.

             

            He certainly did contract a severe chill for which he was bled and blistered, and although he had a nasty cough, seemed to be recovering, when all of a sudden whilst chatting with friends one evening he began to cough uncontrollably, seized his stomach and died.  The post mortem found a burst abscess in his chest (hence the cricket ball theory).

            He was buried in Westminster Abbey and is now mainly remembered by the lampoon of an epitaph, probably written by a Jacobite:

             

            Here lies poor Fred, who was alive and is dead;

            Had it been his father, I had much rather;

            Had it been his brother, still better than another;

            Had it been his sister, nobody would have missed her;

            Had it been the whole generation, so much better for the nation.

            But since it is Fred, who was alive and is dead,

            There is no more to be said.

             

            It’s a bit unfair of him to be remembered this way. It’s true that to the average citizen of Britain his death did not make much difference to their lives. To history it is his inferior side that he’s remembered by, as a rake, practical joker and ineffectual member of the royal family.  But his friends had quite a different view of him, and he was certainly a caring husband and parent, was generous and sensitive, and far more humane than his brother Cumberland, very attached to Great Britain, and assertive of the rights of its inhabitants.

            He may well have been a far better king of the country than either his father or grandfather were. Sadly we will never know.

            Share

            Related posts

            Historical Biographies
            August 17, 2020

            Strong Women Of The Past: Duchess of Gordon


            Read more
            Historical Biographies
            July 15, 2020

            Strong Women Of The Past: Anne McKay


            Read more
            Historical Biographies
            June 15, 2020

            Strong Women Of The Past: Colonel Anne Mackintosh


            Read more
            Historical Biographies
            May 15, 2020

            Strong Women of the Past: Jenny Cameron of Glendessary


            Read more

            Leave a Reply Cancel reply

            Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

            Join Julia Brannan's Mailing List - Click Here Now!

            Latest Blogs from Julia
            • Scottish Folk Tales (Part Four)
            • Scottish Folk Tales (Part Three)
            • Scottish Folk Tales (Part Two)
            • Scottish Folk Tales (Part One)
            • The Author’s View: Writing the Jacobite Chronicles Stories.
            The Jacobite Chronicles Books
            • Mask of Duplicity
            • Dealing in Treason
            • The Mask Revealed
            • The Gathering Storm
            • The Storm Breaks
            • Pursuit of Princes
            • Tides of Fortune
            More Julia Brannan Books
            • The Whores Tale
            • The Eccentrics Tale
            • The Ladies Tale
            • The Highlanders Tale
            • The Baronets Tale
            • A 75% Solution
            © Julia Brannan - www.juliabrannan.com - All Rights Reserved - Privacy Policy
                      No results See all results
                      Manage Cookie Consent
                      To provide the best experiences, we use technologies to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site.
                      Functional Always active
                      The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
                      Preferences
                      The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
                      Statistics
                      The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
                      Marketing
                      The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
                      Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
                      View preferences
                      {title} {title} {title}